
What Are the 6 Best Gong Alternatives for Sales Teams in 2025?
Saving time and effort with Notta, starting from today!
After evaluating pricing, transcription accuracy, sales AI agent capabilities and CRM integration across six Gong competitors, the best options are Notta (98.86% accuracy, $98-200/year), Fireflies.ai (800 minutes free storage, $120-228/year), and Clari Copilot (enterprise real-time coaching, $1,080-1,320/year). These three platforms deliver 85-90% of Gong's functionality at 85-95% lower cost.
If you want to take a closer look at which options will be best for your sales team or personal use, you’ve come to the right place. We’ll be covering the six best alternatives to Gong that you can choose right now, including their prices, sales AI agent capabilities, supported languages, and transcription accuracy.
Key Takeaways
Budget under $200/year per user? → Notta or Fireflies
Need real-time coaching? → Notta or Clari Copilot
Already use ZoomInfo? → Chorus
Multilingual team? → Notta (58 languages with real-time bilingual support)
100+ sales reps? → Gong or Clari Copilot
Under 50 reps? → Notta
Quick Reference | Platform Comparison Table
| Feature | Notta | Fireflies | Clari Copilot | Chorus | Salesloft | Avoma | Gong |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual Cost | $98-$200 | $120-$228 | $1,080-$1,320 | $9,200+ | $1,500-$1,980 | $228-$468 | $6,600+ |
| Transcription Accuracy | 98.86% | 90-95% | 92-96% | 93-95% | 88-92% | 80-85% | 85-90% |
| Languages Supported | 58 | 100+ | 25+ | 20 | 6 | 50+ | 70+ |
| Real-Time Coaching | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Free Trial/Plan | 120 min | 800 min | 14-day trial | No trial | No trial | No trial | No trial |
| Best For | Accuracy + international teams | Mid-market value | Enterprise coaching | ZoomInfo users | Full sales suite | Meeting scheduling | Enterprise 100+ reps |
| Savings vs. Gong | 97-98.5% | 96.5-98% | 80-83.6% | -39% (costs more) | 70-77% | 65-96.5% | Baseline |
What Is Gong and Why Look for Alternatives?
Gong is a revenue intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales calls to provide insights on deal health and forecast accuracy. The software costs $1,600 per user annually, plus a $5,000 annual platform fee. This means the minimum total annual cost is $6,600 for a single user.
Gong pioneered conversation intelligence for B2B sales teams with these capabilities:
Call recording and transcription across 70+ languages
Revenue intelligence with 12+ specialized AI agents
Deal risk identification and pipeline forecasting
CRM automation and activity capture
Sales coaching and performance analytics
Conversation analysis for objections, competitors, and buying signals
Why Do Many Mid-Market Teams Choose Alternatives to Gong?
1. Enterprise-Only Pricing Excludes Growing Teams
Gong requires a $5,000 platform fee plus $1,600 per user annually. For a 10-person team, total cost exceeds $21,000 annually, prohibitive for small-mid companies.
2. Implementation Takes 2-4 Weeks Versus 15 Minutes
Gong deployment demands 2-4 weeks with dedicated RevOps resources for CRM mapping, tracker configuration, and training. Organizations without RevOps support face extended ramp times. Alternatives like Notta or fireflies deploy in 15-30 minutes.
3. Limited Integration Flexibility for Non-Salesforce Users
Gong optimizes for Salesforce and Outreach. Teams using HubSpot, Pipedrive, or Close experience integration friction with delayed sync times (8 to 24 hours versus real-time) and missing field mappings. Alternatives offer broader, deeper integration ecosystems.
4. Contract Inflexibility Creates Financial Risk
Gong typically requires 12-24 month commitments with difficulty reducing seats mid-contract. Flexible alternatives allow month-to-month scaling.
5. Transcription Accuracy Trails Three Competitors
Gong's 85-90% accuracy proves adequate for sentiment analysis but frustrating for technical discussions. Notta (98.86%), Chorus (93-95%), and Clari Copilot (92-96%) deliver superior precision.
Bottom Line: Most sales teams with fewer than 50 reps need reliable conversation capture, CRM automation, and basic coaching, all available through alternatives at 85-95% cost savings.
How Much Do Alternatives Cost Compared to Gong?
Gong alternatives cost $98-1,980 per user annually versus Gong's $6,600+ per user annually. This table shows exact pricing for each platform:
| Platform | Monthly Cost | Annual Cost | Savings vs. Gong |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notta | $8.17-16.67 | $98-200 | 97-98.5% |
| Fireflies | $10-19 | $120-228 | 96.5-98% |
| Avoma | $19-$39 | $228-1,788 | 65-96.5% |
| Clari Copilot | $90-110 | $1,080-1,320 | 80-83.6% |
| Salesloft | $125-165 | $1,500-1,980 | 70-77% |
| Chorus | $766.6+ | $9,200+ | -39% (more expensive) |
| Gong | $550+ | $6,600+ | Baseline |
What Are the Best Gong Alternatives?
The best Gong alternatives are Notta for accuracy, multilingual support and budget (98.86% accuracy, real-time transcription and translation, $98-200/year), Fireflies for mid-market teams (200+ AI apps, $120-228/year), and Clari Copilot for enterprise coaching (real-time battle cards, $1,080-1,320/year). Each platform excels in specific use cases based on team size, budget, and feature priorities.
1. Notta - Best for Accuracy & Multilingual Teams
Why choose Notta? Notta delivers industry-leading 98.86% transcription accuracy at $8.17 to 16.67/month per user depending on the plan, making it the optimal choice for technical sales teams, multilingual organizations, and budget-conscious companies prioritizing transcript precision over advanced revenue intelligence features.
What Features Does Notta Offer?
Core capabilities:
Industry-leading accuracy: 98.86% transcription rate (13 percentage points higher than Gong's 85-90%)
Multilingual excellence: 58 languages with real-time bilingual transcription that handles two languages spoken simultaneously
File upload support: Analyze pre-recorded sales calls in MP3, MP4, WAV, and many more formats
Advanced AI agents: Automated objection tracking, competitor mention detection, next-step extraction, and BANT scoring
Custom vocabulary: Product names and technical terms transcribe accurately after one-time dictionary setup
AI chat interface: Ask questions about call content ("What objections did the prospect raise?" or "Did they mention budget?")
What platforms does Notta integrate with?
Video conferencing: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Webex
CRM systems: Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho, Zendesk, Salesflare, Freshsales
Productivity tools: Slack, Notion, Google Drive, Dropbox
Automation: Zapier (connects to 8,000+ applications)
Who Should Use Notta?
Technical B2B sales teams where accuracy impacts deal progression
Multilingual organizations with sales teams across the World
Teams needing to analyze libraries of pre-recorded sales calls from the past
Budget-conscious organizations
Companies with 5-50 sales reps seeking 95%+ cost savings versus Gong
What Are Notta's Limitations?
Smaller conversation intelligence toolset vs. purpose-built platforms
Free plan's 3-minute limit restricts evaluation
2. Fireflies.ai - Which Platform Offers the Best Free Trial?
Fireflies provides the best free evaluation with 800 minutes of storage, allowing risk-free testing before committing. This makes Fireflies ideal for mid-market teams wanting to validate conversation intelligence ROI before purchasing.
What Makes Fireflies Different from Other Alternatives?
Key differentiators:
200+ AI Apps: Pre-built workflows for BANT Sales, Deal Risk Assessment, Objection Handler, and Competitor Intelligence
Conversation intelligence: Automated sentiment analysis, talk-time ratio tracking, question frequency counting, and filler word detection
Global search: Find specific keywords, customer names, or competitors mentioned across your entire conversation library (thousands of calls)
800 minutes free storage: Evaluate the platform through 10-15 real sales calls before deciding to upgrade
What Platforms Does Fireflies Integrate With?
CRM systems: Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Close, Copper, Zoho, Freshsales
Sales engagement: Outreach, Salesloft, Apollo.io for cadence coordination
Communication: Slack and Microsoft Teams
Developer tools: GraphQL API for custom workflow automation
Who Should Choose Fireflies Over Gong?
Mid-market sales teams with 10-50 reps seeking conversation intelligence without enterprise pricing
Series A-C startups needing CRM automation on limited budgets ($120-228 per rep annually versus Gong's $6,600)
Organizations prioritizing workflow automation through pre-built AI apps
Global teams requiring 50+ language support beyond English, Spanish, French, and German
Companies wanting an extended free evaluation period
What Are Fireflies' Drawbacks?
Confusing credit system: Free plan uses credits per minute transcribed, with complex calculation rules that confuse new users
8-12 minute processing delay: Transcripts appear 8-12 minutes after calls end versus Notta's real-time transcription
Smart search paywall: Advanced search features require Pro plan minimum ($120/year)
Storage caps: Free plan limited to 800 minutes total; Business plan needed for unlimited storage
3. Clari Copilot - What's the Best Enterprise Alternative to Gong?
Clari Copilot offers enterprise-grade conversation intelligence with real-time coaching at $90-110/month per user ($1,080-1,320 annually), delivering 80-83.6% cost savings versus Gong. This positions Clari Copilot as the optimal choice for enterprise sales organizations with 50-500 reps seeking Gong-level capabilities without premium pricing.
What Enterprise Features Does Clari Copilot Provide?
Core capabilities:
Real-time coaching: Live battle cards, talk-time alerts, competitor tracking, next-step reminders
Deal intelligence: MEDDIC/BANT scoring, stakeholder mapping, buying signal
detection, risk assessment
Revenue forecasting: Native Clari integration, deal health scoring (40+ signals),
pipeline coverage analysis
CRM automation: Auto-logged activities, contact role updates, next-step tracking, email
follow-up drafting
Processing speed: 2-4 minutes post-call (faster than Gong's 5-8 minutes)
What Integrations Does Clari Copilot Support?
Video conferencing: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Webex
CRM systems: Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics, Pipedrive
Sales engagement: Outreach, Salesloft, Apollo.io
Communication: Slack, Microsoft Teams for instant insights sharing
Who Should Choose Clari Copilot?
Enterprise sales teams with 50-500 reps seeking Gong alternative with 80%+ cost savings
Organizations already using Clari for revenue forecasting (native integration adds value)
Sales leaders prioritizing real-time coaching over post-call analysis
Companies with complex B2B sales cycles (3-18 months) requiring deal intelligence
Teams with annual conversation intelligence budgets of $50,000-150,000
What Are Clari Copilot's Limitations?
Requires Clari subscription for full value (adds $60-100/user/month)
Smaller user community vs. established players
No free plan (14-day trial only)
4. Chorus by ZoomInfo - Should ZoomInfo Users Choose Chorus?
Chorus integrates natively with ZoomInfo's contact database, increasing data match rates by 33% versus standalone conversation intelligence platforms. This makes Chorus the optimal choice for organizations already paying for ZoomInfo SalesOS.
What Makes Chorus Unique for ZoomInfo Users?
Key capabilities:
Conversation intelligence: Deal momentum tracking, competitor alerts, call scoring, coaching libraries
ZoomInfo integration: Contact verification, org chart mapping, buying signal tracking, lead scoring enhancement
CRM automation: Activity auto-logging, contact role updates, opportunity field mapping
Sales coaching: Talk-time ratio, question frequency, methodology adherence (MEDDIC, BANT)
What Platforms Does Chorus Integrate With?
Video conferencing: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Webex, GoToMeeting
CRM systems: Salesforce (optimized), HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics
ZoomInfo products: Native integration with contact database, intent data, and SalesOS
Sales engagement: Outreach, Salesloft (basic integration)
Who Should Choose Chorus?
Organizations with existing ZoomInfo subscriptions seeking conversation intelligence integration
US-based, English-speaking sales teams with 50+ reps (language limitation eliminates global teams)
Teams prioritizing contact data enrichment workflows over conversation analysis depth
Why Do Most Teams Skip Chorus?
Critical limitations:
English-only support (disqualifies multilingual teams)
$8,000-9,200 annual minimum prohibits mid-market
ZoomInfo ecosystem lock-in reduces value for non-users
5. Salesloft - Should You Buy a Full Sales Engagement Suite?
Salesloft combines sales engagement (multi-channel cadences, dialer, email automation) with conversation intelligence in one platform. This consolidation makes sense for enterprise teams (50+ reps) executing high-volume outbound without existing engagement tools, but creates feature overwhelm and cost bloat for teams needing only conversation intelligence.
What Does Salesloft's Full Suite Include?
Key Features:
Sales engagement core: Multi-channel cadences (email, phone, LinkedIn, SMS), built-in dialer, email automation, LinkedIn automation
Conversation AI: Call recording (88-92% accuracy), deal health scoring, coaching insights, competitor tracking
Revenue workflow: CRM sync, activity capture, lead routing, pipeline management
Analytics: Activity metrics, response rate tracking, pipeline generation, forecast impact
26 AI agents: Post-Drift acquisition (2024) for objection handling, follow-up drafting
What Platforms Does Salesloft Integrate With?
Video conferencing: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams
CRM systems: Salesforce (deep native integration), HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics
Data providers: ZoomInfo, Clearbit, Lusha, Apollo.io for contact enrichment
Marketing automation: Marketo, Pardot, HubSpot Marketing for lead handoff
Communication: Slack, Microsoft Teams for notifications
Who Should Choose Salesloft?
Enterprise sales teams (50+ reps) executing high-volume outbound prospecting
Organizations consolidating multiple tools (dialer + cadence software + conversation intelligence = one platform)
Deep Salesforce users requiring native integration with complex field mappings
Companies with $75,000-150,000 annual budget for sales engagement and conversation intelligence combined
Why Do Teams With Existing Tools Skip Salesloft?
Feature overwhelming for teams needing only conversation intelligence
Sales engagement focus may not suit teams with existing tools (Outreach)
Demo-only pricing lacks transparency
6. Avoma - Should You Choose Meeting Lifecycle Management?
Avoma combines meeting scheduling with conversation intelligence, creating an all-in-one workflow from booking through post-meeting follow-up. This integration appeals to teams wanting scheduling and intelligence unified, but 80-85% transcription accuracy and reliability concerns make Avoma the weakest choice for technical sales requiring precision.
What Is Avoma's Meeting Lifecycle Approach?
Key Features:
Pre-meeting: Embedded booking pages, calendar integrations, agenda templates, automated reminders
During-meeting: Live transcription, AI note-taking, collaborative notes, scorecards (MEDDIC, BANT)
Post-meeting: AI summaries, CRM auto-sync, action item routing, recording library, snippet sharing
Conversation intelligence: Talk-time ratio, keyword tracking, sentiment analysis, coaching insights
What Platforms Does Avoma Integrate With?
Video conferencing: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Webex, GoToMeeting
CRM systems: Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Close
Sales engagement: Outreach, Salesloft for cadence coordination
Who Might Consider Avoma?
Teams needing meeting scheduling integrated with conversation intelligence
Organizations prioritizing structured scorecards (MEDDIC, BANT) over transcription accuracy
What are Avoma’s limitations?
80-85% accuracy (15-20 points below Notta)
User reviews cite reliability issues (73% report accuracy/stability concerns)
Limited language support
Scheduling focus may not justify adoption with existing tools
Add-ons significantly increase cost
Can these alternatives integrate with my CRM?
CRM integration breadth varies significantly, Notta supports 7 CRMs, Fireflies supports 12 CRMs, while others optimize for Salesforce and offer limited support for alternatives.
| Platform | Salesforce | HubSpot | Pipedrive | Zoho | Salesflare | Freshsales | Zendesk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notta | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Fireflies | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Clari Copilot | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Chorus | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Salesloft | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Avoma | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Gong | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Which Gong Alternative Should You Choose Based on Team Size?
Team size determines optimal platform choice because pricing efficiency, feature needs, and implementation complexity vary with scale. This framework matches each team size category to the best-value alternative.
Startups & Small Teams (1-10 reps)
Recommended: Notta Pro ($16.67/month per user)
Why this choice wins:
Highest accuracy (98.86%) ensures technical sales precision
Lowest cost ($200 annually per user) fits startup budgets
15-minute self-service setup requires no IT resources
Custom vocabulary handles product terminology accurately
Mid-Market Teams (10-50 reps)
Recommended Option 1: Notta Business ($16.67/month per user) - Critical for technical sales requiring 98%+ accuracy
Why technical teams choose Notta:
98.86% accuracy prevents deal slowdowns from transcription errors
Multilingual support (58 languages) serves global prospect bases
$200 annually per user maintains affordability during scaling
Recommended Option 2: Fireflies Business ($19/month per user) - Best for teams prioritizing workflow automation
Why mid-market teams choose Fireflies:
80% of Gong functionality at 10% of Gong cost
200+ AI Apps automate post-call workflows (BANT scoring, deal risk assessment)
Generous free trial (800 minutes) validates ROI before purchase
Enterprise Teams (50-500 reps)
Recommended Option 1: Notta Pro ($16.67/month per user) - Highest accuracy, lowest cost persists at enterprise scale
Recommended Option 2: Clari Copilot ($110/month per user) - Real-time coaching justifies premium over Notta
Real-time coaching during live calls improves rep performance immediately
Deal intelligence and native forecast integration serve complex B2B cycles
50-80% cost savings versus Gong while maintaining enterprise features
Recommended Option 3: Gong ($550/month per user) - Only if you meet ALL criteria:
100+ quota-carrying reps (smaller teams don't justify complexity)
Complex B2B sales cycles (6-18 months) requiring sophisticated deal intelligence
Dedicated RevOps team to manage 2-4 week implementation and ongoing optimization
$500,000+ annual conversation intelligence budget approved
Advanced revenue forecasting needs beyond what Clari Copilot provides
Which Platform Supports Advanced Language Capabilities?
Fireflies supports 100+ languages, followed by Gong (70+), Notta (58), and Avoma (50+). However, language count alone doesn't determine the best choice for multilingual teams. Transcription quality, real-time capabilities, and bilingual support matter more.
This table compares language capabilities across all platforms:
| Platform | Languages | Real-Time Transcription | Real-Time Translation | Bilingual Transcription |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notta | 58 | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes (unique capability) |
| Gong | 70+ | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Fireflies | 100+ | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Salesloft | 4 | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Clari Copilot | 25+ | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Avoma | 50+ | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Chorus | 1 (English only) | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No |
The Bottom Line
Save 97% Without Sacrificing Quality
Most sales teams don't need to pay Gong's expensive annual price for conversation intelligence. Notta delivers higher accuracy (98.86% vs. 85-90%), faster setup (15 minutes vs. 4 weeks), and better multilingual support (58 languages) at just $98-200 per year.
Start saving today: Sign up for Notta Pro to test on your next 3 sales calls, then upgrade to Business for $16.67/month when you're ready to scale.