What is Claude 3 and How to Use It
Record, transcribe and summarize conversations with one click.
Anthropic's Claude 3 model family marked a significant shift in AI capability when it launched in early 2024. For the first time, an Anthropic model didn't just compete with OpenAI's GPT-4, it outperformed it across several of the most established academic benchmarks. That said, Claude 3 isn't a single model. It's a family of three, Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus, each built for a different trade-off between speed, cost, and intelligence.
This guide breaks down what Claude 3 actually is, how the three models differ in practice, where the performance claims hold up, and how to access it for free or at cost, depending on your needs.
What is Claude 3?
Claude 3 is a family of large language models developed by Anthropic, a safety-focused AI company founded by former members of OpenAI. The Claude 3 family consists of three distinct models — Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus — released simultaneously in March 2024. Each model sits at a different point on the intelligence-speed-cost spectrum, giving developers and individual users the flexibility to choose the right tool for a given task.
Compared to Claude 2, the previous generation, Claude 3 brought meaningful improvements across every dimension Anthropic measures: reasoning accuracy, visual understanding, instruction-following, speed, and the ability to process very long documents. It also introduced multimodal input, meaning all three models can now process images alongside text.
The comparison with GPT-4 is legitimate but requires some nuance. Claude 3 Opus outperformed GPT-4 on several standard benchmarks at the time of release, but performance differences vary depending on the task and evaluation method. The more honest framing is that Claude 3 Opus competes directly at the frontier — and in some areas, leads it.
Claude 3 model details
The three models in the Claude 3 family are not simply the same system at different power settings. They reflect genuine trade-offs in architecture priorities, and choosing between them matters for cost and performance in production.
Claude 3 Haiku
Haiku is the fastest and cheapest model in the family. Anthropic describes it as the most cost-effective model in its intelligence category. At the time of launch, it was priced at $0.25 per million input tokens — roughly a quarter of what competitors charged for comparable performance. More concretely, Haiku can read and process a 10,000-token research paper, including charts and graphs, in under three seconds.
That speed makes Haiku well-suited for applications that require real-time response: customer support bots, live chat interfaces, content moderation pipelines, and high-volume data extraction tasks where waiting for a response isn't acceptable. Accuracy per token is lower than Opus, but for tasks where speed and cost are the binding constraints, Haiku typically delivers more than enough.
Claude 3 Sonnet
Sonnet is the workhorse of the family — the model Anthropic chose to power the free tier of claude.ai. It sits between Haiku and Opus on every axis: more capable than Haiku, significantly faster and cheaper than Opus. Anthropic benchmarked Sonnet at roughly 2x the speed of Claude 2 and Claude 2.1, with meaningfully higher intelligence.
In practice, Sonnet handles the majority of realistic enterprise workloads well: coding assistance, data processing, knowledge retrieval, content generation at scale, and task automation. It's the model most users will encounter first, and for most day-to-day tasks, it's the one they'll stick with.
Claude 3 Opus
Opus is Anthropic's flagship reasoning model. It outperforms both previous Claude generations and, at launch, outperformed GPT-4 on MMLU (undergraduate-level expert knowledge), GPQA (graduate-level scientific reasoning), and GSM8K (mathematical problem solving). Anthropic positions it for complex, open-ended tasks where quality matters more than speed or cost.
Opus isn't twice as good as Sonnet on simple tasks — the gains become significant at the frontier of difficulty: nuanced analysis, multi-step reasoning under ambiguity, scientific or legal research, and scenarios where the model encounters genuinely novel problem structures. Compared to Claude 2.1, Opus demonstrated a roughly twofold improvement in accuracy on complex factual questions while also reducing hallucinations.
Source: Introducing the next generation of Claude \ Anthropic
When should you use Claude 3?
Claude 3 has more advanced features than its earlier version. If you want to try Claude 3, here's what you can expect from the AI chatbot.
Data Analyst: If there's something tedious and boring, it's analyzing large amounts of data manually (at least for me). Thankfully, Claude 3 can help here! You can use the AI chatbot to analyze, organize, and extract helpful information from the data.
Personal Assistant: Claude 3 is best known for generating safe output, following user prompts, and understanding the user intent. For example, you can ask the AI chatbot to write hundreds of emails every day to reduce the workload and save time.
Text Generation & Writing: Whether you want to generate text from scratch or improve already-written text, Claude 3 can help. It's a pretty decent AI model that can generate emails, ad copy, outlines, essays, and social media posts.
Summarize Text: Claude 3 works like an AI summarizer that can analyze documents or images to generate a short, meaningful version.
How to access Claude 3?
While the initial beta release of Claude was available in only a few countries, users can now access Claude 3 in various countries. Here, I'll reveal three ways to access Claude 3:
#1 Access via Claude Chat
If you want to access the Claude 3 models, simply create an account on the official website of Anthropic. Anyone who creates a free Claude account can use the Claude 3 Sonnet models — though you'll have to pay $20 to access the Claude 3 Opus model.
#2 Access via Anthropic Workbench
If you are searching for ‘how to access Claude 3 Opus for free,’ the first step is to sign up for Anthropic API. To do this, head to console.anthropic.com and create a free account. Anyone creating an account will get $5 as free credits. Then, click on the ‘Workbench’ tab and select the ‘claude-3-opus-20240229’ model to start using Opus for free.
#3 Access via Claude 3 API
Claude 3 API is another way to try these new and advanced Claude models. The developer offers client Software Development Kits for Typescript and Python. Each Claude model has its own cost and intelligence level.
Source: Claude API \ Anthropic
How to use Claude 3?
In this section, I'll help you understand the steps to use Claude 3 for free:
Step 1: Log in
To get started, head to the Claude website and create a free account using your email address and phone number.
Step 2: Ask questions
Next, you can start typing the prompt. Remember, there is very little chance that the first time you enter the prompt, it'll generate exactly what you are looking for. You'll need to write, rewrite, refine, and test different prompts until you get an outcome you're happy with. Click ‘Send,’ and Claude will generate an answer. If you're not happy with the output, simply click on the ‘Retry’ button.
Step 3: Copy or report the output
Right at the bottom of the answer, you'll find different options: copy button to copy the output, thumbs-up for positive feedback, and thumbs-down to report the answer.
Note: The free version of Claude 3 lets you access the Sonnet model, whereas you'll need to pay some amount ($20 per month) to try the Claude 3 Opus model.
To see the Claude 3 Sonnet model in action, I gave it a couple of tasks. As you can see (from the image below), Claude 3 did a decent job with most of its answers following the three things — helpful, harmless, and honest.
I also tested the vision capabilities of Claude 3, which can interpret photos, diagrams, and charts in many formats. For example, I uploaded an image and asked ‘What's in the image?’ The results were pretty good.
Benchmark Performance: How Claude 3 Actually Compares
Performance claims for AI models are easy to make and difficult to evaluate without context, so it helps to look at what the benchmarks actually test.
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) tests expert-level knowledge across 57 subjects including law, medicine, history, and mathematics. Claude 3 Opus scored above GPT-4 at launch. This benchmark reflects broad factual recall and reasoning, not creative output.
GPQA (Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A) tests reasoning on questions that require genuine expert-level thinking — the kind that can't be answered by surface-level pattern matching. Opus performed strongly here, which is relevant for any application involving scientific, medical, or technical analysis.
GSM8K tests grade-school through multi-step mathematical reasoning. Claude 3 models performed well across the family on this benchmark, including Haiku.
One benchmark worth particular attention is the Needle in a Haystack (NIAH) evaluation, which tests a model's ability to find and recall a specific piece of information buried inside a very large document. Claude 3 Opus achieved over 99% accuracy on this test. For enterprise users who work with long contracts, research papers, or internal knowledge bases, that level of recall reliability is practically significant.
What Claude 3 Is Actually Good At
The use cases that map well to Claude 3's actual strengths:
Long-document analysis. The 200K context window, combined with high NIAH recall accuracy, makes Claude 3 one of the more reliable tools for processing contracts, research papers, financial reports, or technical documentation and extracting specific information from them.
Coding assistance. All three models handle code generation and debugging well. Sonnet is typically the right choice here — fast enough for interactive use, accurate enough for production-quality output.
Writing and editing. Claude 3 models follow nuanced stylistic instructions well, adhere to brand voice guidelines, and maintain consistent tone across long-form content. This extends to structured formats like JSON, which all three models can reliably produce for downstream processing.
Data extraction and classification. Haiku's speed and low cost make it practical for applying AI classification to large data pipelines where running Opus on every record would be prohibitively expensive.
Multimodal document processing. Any workflow that involves PDFs, slide decks, or image-heavy reports benefits from Claude 3's ability to process visual input alongside text.
Want the convenience of automated note-taking and AI summaries? Try Notta for your upcoming meetings.
FAQs
Is Claude safe to use?
Yes, Claude is one of the safest AI chatbots available. The developers of Claude are continuously raising the bar for safety by taking a different approach. The company created a second AI model called constitutional AI to discourage biased and unethical answers — ensuring the chatbot provides honest, helpful, and harmless output.
How much does Claude 3 cost?
The Claude 3 is available in three different sizes — Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. The Claude 3 Sonnet is free for anyone who creates a Claude account. However, if you want to test the Claude 3 Opus model, you must purchase the Claude Pro plan, which costs $20 per month.
Key takeaways
AI chatbots are fun and useful — and Claude 3 is one of them. It's a powerful model that's designed to generate helpful answers. It's safe and free to use — so you can give it a spin and see how well it stacks up against other AI chatbot builders. Anthropic's primary goal is to make Claude safe and helpful for everyone — which is beneficial for anyone looking to try AI tools. Now that you've learned how to use Claude 3, it's time to try it — and, that too, for free!
Notta, an AI note-taking and transcription tool, uses the advanced capabilities of Claude 3’s API to help you transcribe lengthy audio/video files — and then summarize the text into a set of action items. If you want to experience the powerful AI transcription tool, create a free Notta account today!
